“The Non-Theistic Pagan, Part 1” by Michele Briere

Most of the pagans I know all believe in the reality of their gods. Some even believe in the reality of the myths, just as people of other religions believe in their holy books. I don’t. I believe in physical evidence, and the only thing the myths tell us is a reflection of the society that wrote them. If the gods had truly walked the earth, I’m sure their power would have left some sort of physical evidence. A being capable of creating everything, and yet nothing except stories exist? That isn’t good enough for me. Any information we have on the gods, from stories to statues, all come from people.

Evidence shows us that people took their gods with them as they traveled, and they picked up concepts of local deities and beliefs as they traveled, adding them to their own gods. If you read some really dry book on Proto-Indo-European languages, you’ll see how this theory has been shown to work using basic language. This is why a lot of the languages of Europe have words that are similar to each other in multiple languages. Before the concept of deity in the image of humans was the animistic concepts of animals, rocks, and plants being imbued with a living life force, which we still see in tribal peoples all over the world.

There are people who will point to the small female figurines that have been found, insisting that the prehistoric people had deity in the form of the great mother goddess. Well, no, we don’t know that; those figurines have no labels. We don’t know the intent of the people who created those figurines, except that they are found in fields and caves. The oldest, so far, of the so-called Venus figurines is the Venus of Hohle Fels, dating to about 35,000 years ago, was found in Germany. None of the figurines, either in the carvings or cave paintings, have been shown as pregnant. With the rounded hips and heavy breasts, I see them as fertility dolls.

Let’s look at it logically: these caves usually have paintings of hunting scenes, of animals, of things of nature. If we look at a cave as a type of womb, we now see the scene as possibly sympathetic magic in which the shaman places a figurine or paints on the wall, asking that something, a birth, or fertility, come about for the tribe or for a person.

A few of the figurines are even long and narrow, with few jutting edges, which looks to me as though they may have been used as phallic devices to encourage engendering, either as a dildo or to be poked into the ground, a phallus penetrating the womb of the earth, or maybe an early thought toward the importance of both sexes in the role of fertility.

As with science, the gods must be reasoned. You cannot get from primitive Venus dolls made by people who could neither read nor write, much less create a decent home by decorating their caves properly, to armies of gods storming the planet in battle with each other for supremacy such as the Celtic and Greek myths claim. There is no physical connection between the world of myth and the world of reality.

Formorians vs Tuatha De Danan, Titans vs Zeus, Tiamat vs Marduk; these are all examples of primordial nature pitted against the new laws of man. Those titanic battles (Titans = titanic), if they had actually happened, would have left their marks on the planet for us to see just as ancient meteor strikes have, major volcanic eruptions, and massive earthquakes.

Those types of events could be where the ancient peoples got the idea for those battles. I do recommend you read these myths; don’t overlook them. They are important to whatever culture you are learning about, just as the Book of Genesis is important to Abraham’s tribes.

Do I believe the gods are real? The simple answer is –no. There is absolutely no physical evidence of deity. If beings so powerful created this world, as well as the universe, there would be evidence. Some physical manifestation of their presence. And we must ask ourselves: If beings strong enough to create this living planet and all its creatures, why would such beings even need people to worship them? Are their egos really that fragile?

We look around the world today and see one atrocity after another done in the name of religion. Religions which are nothing more than dogma, a set of rules and laws to keep the populace under control. A thing in which the few claim control over the self-determination of billions of others. It is a theocratic dictatorship that threatens eternal damnation to any who disobey. So where is this evil place in which people are arbitrarily sentenced unto eternity? Not one person alive has seen it. Never in the two thousand plus years that Abraham’s children have been wreaking havoc across the globe has there been one person who could step forward and show evidence of heaven or hell.

Monotheists strut around taking credit for the industrial world, today’s modern world, the cities, towns, and countries, lauding great rulers such as Charlemagne and Constantine for bringing the barbarians to God. They ignore the fact that these ‘great rulers’ killed every single man, woman, and child who didn’t bow to their god. What did the Witch Burnings of Europe teach us? It taught us that someone put under enough pain will admit to anything, whether it’s the truth or not. Many people faced a knife at their throat if they didn’t convert there and then. By the next generation, such beliefs are normal for the children who haven’t been taught otherwise. That is brainwashing. Remember the Spanish in the Americas, the colonists and the First Nations, the British and the Aborigines of Australia. Ignoring history doesn’t make it go away.

What they forget, however, is that it was those ‘barbarians’ that built civilization. Polytheists created the first settlements, learned to farm the land, tame the creatures, the first alphabets, written stories, laws, courts, schools, philosophy, science, medicine. Abraham’s children have the polytheists to thank for the invention of the alphabet in which their holy books were written.

Continued in Part 2 …

About the Author

51Io2siYKLL._UX250_Michele has always had a head filled with characters talking to each other, which made it only natural that she either ended up in a loony bin or put them down in writing. She blames it on Chris Carter and the writers of X-Files fan fiction for her leap into writing. Once she discovered fan fiction, it was a scream and jump off the cliff and into hangers. Lots of ‘slash’ here, (gay couples) but then it is fan fiction. –Warning: some adult content. This was only the start, though, a great place for a budging writer to practice.

With more and more original characters added to the fan fiction stories, this eventually led to fully original stories which are currently on her website at http://www.michelebriere.com

She’s on Facebook, if you’d like to say Hi: https://www.facebook.com/michele.ashipu

Or just drop an email at michele.briere@outlook.com

Advertisements

7 Comments on ““The Non-Theistic Pagan, Part 1” by Michele Briere

  1. So interesting to have this pop up at the moment I am reading Buddhism Without Belief and my first text on Heathenism, which seems to be calling me at this moment in my life. I am probably about to utter neophyte heresy but I do believe there is an Omniscience. Where I am finding that in what I have read so far of Heathenism is the Wyrd itself, the vast interconnection of all things. This is more deist than theist, so it’s probably not an issue for the author.

    What I think about the gods and goddesses. No, I don’t think that somewhere in the cosmos we perceive through science that there is somewhere a Valhalla with Odin tramping around trailed by Valkyries. I have always viewed diety, where ever I have been on my long and complicated spiritual path, as something like a hologram. It is a projection of our internal spirit onto a larger space, let us for now call it the Wyrd, which is the “atmosphere” onto which we project our spiritual nature in terms that speak to us.

    This is why the Omniscience (and that is not the correct word, let us call it the Universal or Unified Omnipresence, and that is still not quite it, let’s call it the Omnipresent Unified Thing, or OUT, as it is OUT there all around us) presents itself is so many different aspects around our world. It comes reflected back to us from ithe OUT in the cultural terms our conscience mind can best understand, in a way that resonates palpably the way a spider web resonates when touched (to return to the analogy I have encountered for explaining Wyrd).

    It has been a long time since Jesus the deity has held any resonance for me. He is just another teacher. When I was looking for mindful practice, Deistic Buddhism common among the practices I found also did not resonate. At this late moment in my life, it seems as if my German ancestors are calling me toward a lifestyle and belief system that very much fits what is needed to right my topsy turvy life. What I see in Heathenism is a code of conduct that is what is needful to me, as well as an animistic spiritualism which has long been a part of my life (the OUT). That is why the deities of this faith seem so resonant to me at this moment. They are tools like the tools of magick (which I have never practiced), a set of runes, a gazing ball, what have you: a manifestation of my spirituality that facilitates its resonance with the OUT.

    • I just wanted to say that I love your “hologram” analogy and your terminology (i.e. OUT). Both seem very fitting (and creative)

  2. Reblogged this on Ink & Earth and commented:

    I love this article. It covers so much of what’s been running through my head for the last couple of years, expressed in a way I could not. Thank you Michelle Briere, for your intelligent and well-articulated take on religion. I’m looking forward to Part 2.

  3. Pingback: So — ADF material? Also, a neat series. | Strip Me Back To The Bone

  4. The problem with your whole perspective is that you make absolutely no effort to say what would qualify as “physical”, nor which deity/deities you’d describe as not being noticeable by such a category of evidence.
    You are, though, streamlining the substantial body of work and inspirations, which varies widely in pagan beliefs (which does not have to be simplified as having been merely the effects of the academically agreed-upon, biological and cultural aspects of divine inspiration) into your own, egotistic experience, which you do no not effectuate in a manner more significant than that of… well, perhaps someone like Richard Dawkins. Which is to say, it only serves to combat religious dogmas at the surface and not touch upon actual phenomena on the spiritual level.
    At least that is how I see this article, which is all I know about your beliefs at this moment, so excuse my scrutinizing.
    It has to be clearly stated which phenomena you believe to be constrained by the need for physical evidence in order to define what we are even talking about, especially since polytheism has the incomprehensibly larger potential for being idiosyncratic than most monotheistic counterparts, which proves far more attractive and seems less pressured by the type of blind worship you seem to indicate.

  5. Are you familiar with “The thinking atheist” on Blogtalk radio? I think you and Seth would have a GREAT time doing a show together!

%d bloggers like this: